Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to present findings of a study which examined the searching experience of university students with a print disability and their use of screen reading software to navigate three proprietary databases. Participants completed a series of tasks in three different online databases using their screen-reading software. Screen-recording software provided video and audio documentation of the process. Survey data were collected pre- and post-study as well as after each database search session. The paper provides insights on the information-seeking behavior of students with print disabilities as well as the barriers encountered while navigating online databases using screen-reading software. The study focuses only on a small sample of university students with print disabilities and therefore lacks a control group of non-print-disabled students against which the results could be measured. Database vendors are aware of the barriers their databases pose for users of screen readers. It is in the best interest of vendors to assist libraries in promoting the accessible features that already exist in their databases. Libraries can assist students by providing database instruction tailored to users of screen readers and by assisting database vendors in usability feedback and in marketing options. Participants consisted of students with learning, visual and mobility disabilities and who were native users of screen-reading software. There is a lack of research on the intersection of databases design and its impacts on the information literacy skills of students with print disabilities. This paper provides some insights on the first step in the information-seeking process (gathering information) by students with a print disability and the barriers encountered.References
BOWMAN, V. Reading between the lines: an evaluation of WindowEyes screen reader as a reference tool for teaching and learning. Library Hi Tech 2002, Vol. 20, No. 2, s. 162–168.
BRUCE, C. The phenomenon of information literacy. Higher Education Research & Development 1998, Vol. 17, No. 1, s. 25–43.
BYERLEY, S.L., CHAMBERS, M.B. Accessibility and usability of Web-based library databases for non-visual users. Library Hi Tech 2002, Vol. 20, No. 2, s. 169–178.
BYERLEY, S.L., CHAMBERS, M.B., THOHIRA, M. Accessibility of Web-based library databases: the vendors perspectives in 2007. Library Hi Tech 2007, Vol. 25, No. 4, s. 509–527.
Chapman, A. Resource discovery: catalog, cataloging and the user. Library Trends 2007, Vol. 55, No. 4, s. 917–931.
COMEAUX, D., SCHMETZKE, A. Web accessibility trends in university libraries and library schools. Library Hi Tech 2007, Vol. 25, No. 4, s. 457–477.
COONIN, B. Establishing accessibility for e-journals: a suggested approach. Library Hi Tech 2002, Vol. 20, No. 2, s. 207–220.
Copyright Act, R.S. c. C-42 (1985). W: Department of Justice [on-line]. [Dostęp 29.04.2010]. Dostępny w World Wide Web: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-42/index.html.
FINDER, L., DENT, V.F., LYM, B. How the presentation of electronic gateway pages affects research behavior. The Electronic Library 2006, Vol. 24, No. 6, s. 804–819.
HAYA, G., NYGREN, E., WIDMARK, W. Metalib and Google Scholar: a user study. Online Information Review 2006, Vol. 31, No. 3, s. 365–375.
HEAD, A., EISENBERG, M.G. Lessons learned: how college students seek information in the digital age, W: Project Information Literacy Progress Report [on-line]. The Information School, University of Washington 2009 [Dostęp 29.04.2010]. Dostępny w World Wide Web: http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_finalv_YR1_12_2009v2.pdf.
HORWATH, J. Evaluating opportunities for expanded information access: a study of the accessibility of four online databases. Library Hi Tech 2002, Vol. 20, No. 2, s. 199–206.
MITTERMEYER, D., QUIRION, D. Information literacy: study of incoming first-year undergraduates in Quebec. W: Conference of Rectors and Principles of Quebec Universities [on- line] 2003 [Dostęp 15.03.2008]. Dostępny w World Wide Web: http://www.crepuq.qc.ca/documents/bibl/formation/studies Ang.pdf.
NOWICKI, S. Student vs search engine: undergraduates rank results for relevance. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 2003, Vol. 3, No. 1, s. 503–515.
Participation and Activity Limitation Survey 2006: Labour Force Experience of People with Disabilities in Canada. W: Statistics Canada [on-line]. [Dostęp 10.12.2009]. Dostępny w World Wide Web: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-628-x/89-628-x2008007-eng.htm.
POWER, R., LEBEAU, C. How well do academic library web sites address the needs of database users with visual disabilities? The Reference Librarian 2009, No. 50, s. 55–72.
RILEY, C. Libraries, aggregator databases, screen readers and clients with disabilities. Library Hi Tech 2002, Vol. 20, No. 2, s. 179–187.
SAUMURE, K., GIVEN, L.M. Digitally enhanced? An examination of the information behaviours of visually impaired postsecondary students. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 2004, Vol. 28, No. 2, s. 25–42.
SHAPIRO, J., HUGHES, S. Information literacy as a liberal art: enlightenment proposals for a new curriculum. Educom Review 1996, Vol. 31, No. 2, s. 31–35.
Statistics Canada, Participation and Activity Limitation Survey 2006: Labour Force Experience of People with Disabilities in Canada, Statistics Canada, Ottawa [on-line]. 2008 [Dostęp 10.12.2009]. Dostępny w World Wide Web: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89!628!x/89!628!x2008007!eng.pdf.
STEWART, R., NARENDRA, V., SCHMETZKE, A. Accessibility and usability of online library databases. Library Hi Tech 2005, Vol. 23, No. 2, s. 265–286.
VALENTINE, B. The legitimate effort in research papers: student commitment versus faculty expectations. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2001, Vol. 27, No. 2, s. 107–115.
WEILER, A. Information seeking behavior in generation y students: motivation, critical thinking and learning theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005, Vol. 31, No. 1, s. 46–53.
ZOELLNER, K., SAMSON, S., HINES, S. Continuing assessment of library instruction to undergraduates: a general education course survey research project. College & Research Libraries 2008, Vol. 69, No. 4, s. 370–383.
